SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Poet who wrote (31555)10/9/2001 5:17:12 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
There is a time to every purpose under heaven. Anything that implied that there was a basis for the terrorists killing thousands of innocent people, or that the United States was not worth defending, might legitimately be viewed askance. In any event, we have followed a well- worn principle: that it is not up to us to determine the form of government for all of the nations with which we trade, it is for us to deal with the regimes "on the ground".

Even in cases like Cuba, we were initially prepared to accept the revolutionaries, until they declared their ties to the Soviet Union. Carter originally supported the Sandinistas, until they showed themselves to be totalitarian and aligned with Cuba. When it was in our interests, we dealt with Stalin, and later Mao. No one said we should be ashamed of ourselves. Instead, we were praised for pursuing peaceful coexistence.

We have reacted variously over the years. One can find fault with some of it, although some has likely been beneficial. It is impossible to demonstrate all of the "what ifs". The main thing, though, is that we were determined to meet the strategic challenge of the Soviet Union, and took upon ourselves the task of maintaining a reasonable degree of order in the postcolonial period. I think we did a pretty good job.........



To: Poet who wrote (31555)10/9/2001 6:05:27 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Remember, one person's nefarious is another person's heroic. Just ask the people-on-the-street in Iraq, Iran or Egypt.



To: Poet who wrote (31555)10/10/2001 7:33:25 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
our country's deeply-important freedom of speech (a freedom which, by the way, is being derided ... by those who equate patriotism with total acceptance of our current foreign policy)

That would be covered here, then? <gg>

Message 16480521