Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (1375)	10/11/2001 1:07:48 AM
From: PatiBob	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10167

You've gotta wonder how many of them are actually thinking about purchasing a fire arm or already have and just don't want to admit it to their cronies.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (1375)	10/11/2001 7:42:45 AM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10167

You bring up a good point. In my letters and e-mails to my Senators I always state I am a father, a den leader, active in my church, a little league baseball coach and a Patron member of the NRA. I further state that the NRA is not Wayne & Heston, but is people like me, you & your neighbors, your doctor, etc. I want them to know that the NRA is not a nameless faceless machine. -J

To: ManyMoose who wrote (1375)	10/11/2001 8:01:56 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10167

Superlative article from the WSJ: opinionjournal.com ...To understand the fuss over "Arming America," you have to realize how important Mr. Bellesiles's work is to the gun-control movement. It's been rough going for those who believe the Second Amendment only protects "collective" use of guns by an organized militia. Over the past 15 years evidence that the Founders specifically had individual protection in mind has mounted so persuasively that even leading constitutional scholars on the left have been swayed. "Arming America" was the first work in decades that revived the collective-right argument. And while Mr. Bellesiles says he is a historian, the book's promotion was highly political. "Michael A. Bellesiles is the NRA's worst nightmare," screamed one blurb on the back cover. Another: "Thinking people who deplore Americans' addiction to gun violence have been waiting a long time for this information." Most newspaper reviews focused largely on the book's political implications, while making little effort to evaluate its historical accuracy. Meanwhile peer review in historical journals that delves into the nitty-gritty of scholarship is notoriously slow; most reviews don't appear until several years after a book's publication... ...Unsurprisingly, left-leaning journalists, academics and politicians went weak at the knees. The New York Times praised the work before it was released. Noted historians like Garry Wills wrote slobbery reviews. Politicians and lobbyists rushed to incorporate the book's conclusions into their work.... opinionjournal.com