Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GX Investors Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (425)	10/12/2001 5:37:54 AM
From: AlienTech	Respond to of 586

Well it will be good cop bad cop time :> AX is the bad cop and GX is the good cop.. Not that hard to see them talking like tim carey.

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (425)	10/12/2001 12:30:58 PM
From: Bonzo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 586

Talk about a huge Conflict of Interest. Only two AX board members aren't on the GX board. They should recuse themselves and defer the merger evaluation to a 3rd party. A 3rd party valuation appraisal of AX should be an absolute. I don't want to see some GX shenanigans that would result in an AX take-under. Still, 43% of the shareholders are not company related. Only takes one to initiate legal action from one of the attorneys currently all over GX. Because both boards are comprised of essentially the same members it doesn't eliminate their Fiduciary responsibility to 100% of the Shareholders. They must act fairly and in good faith. AX may appear as a (Quasi) tracking stock but its not. Its a legal and separate corporate entity.