SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5111)10/14/2001 11:09:27 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
And before I catch flak about it from wind energy advocates, I would submit that wind power is very useful in specific locations, but neither it, nor solar, will provide the amount of energy our economy requires at an efficient cost.

New sources of energy are one end of the package. On the other end, we have to stop treating 'conservation' as a dirty word. We are profligate in our use of energy.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5111)10/15/2001 4:13:27 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 281500
 
I don't about the science of it, but how's this. Nuclear power plants along waterways that dual use as hydrogen-from-h2o plants. Nuclear generated power, and hydrogen for fuel cell use.

Know if it could be done? Or if it would be cost-efficient?

I found this website about Hydrogen production that's informational:
nrel.gov

Derek


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News