To: RocketMan who wrote (7474 ) 10/16/2001 4:23:59 PM From: epsteinbd Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27666 Definitely, the nuclear plants were not yet loaded with uranium bars, so there was no danger to local populations in blasting the building. Supposedly, the plant was due to be loaded three weeks later. Funnily, the attack was planned on the very day French President Mitterand was "inaugurating his new style" in the national mosoleum where Napoleon remains are kept together with J. Jaures and Schoelcher, (a good slave freer in the Carribeans ) and that attack was postponed for a few days, in order not to ruin the party of the country whose former leaders ( Chirac and Giscard) has sold the plant. Oddly enough, it was the second strike of that Iraki project, as the first one happened in the harbor of Hyères, where the nuclear furnace was stored before shipping, and a small one pound bomb cracked that furnace that cannot be welded, on some very dark night. Furthermore, there was a "French" military officer (read Zionist agent with a real French passport) standing by the Iraki plant with a radio beacon enabling the six Israeli jets to home on their target, and he did such a good job that he was killed under the bombs, but no one really complained. Finally, the Iraki didn't pay for the plant, and they claimed it wasn't yet delivered. I do not regret the money, as I remember sending a check for one barrel of fuel as my personal contribution (1981). And if I may add, did the same later, when Reagan had his raid on Khadafi, though that check, (20$) was never cashed. Those two investments were the soundest ones I have ever made. And sadly enough, I phoned the White House to congratulate President Reagan for his bold move, but didn't get to speak to him, as the WH secretaries are real professionals(g).