SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chowder who wrote (9682)10/17/2001 9:48:53 PM
From: Warpfactor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
The Chinese at it again!! Time for liberals to blow a few more gaskets!!

China bans Middle East visitors
By David Rennie in Beijing
(Filed: 18/10/2001)

CHINA has sparked anger across the Middle East
after it put people from 20 countries and areas
across the region, including Israel, on a secret
security blacklist ahead of this week's Asia Pacific
Economic Co-operation summit (APEC) in Shanghai.

Middle Eastern and Israeli citizens have found
themselves banned from Chinese airlines and
denied visas since the September 11 attacks, and
they have been barred from Shanghai hotels during
the APEC meeting.

China is proud of its reputation as a haven from
international terrorism and is determined that
nothing will go wrong during the summit, which is
due to be attended by world leaders including
President Bush and Vladimir Putin.

The existence of a blacklist has been denied but
Middle Eastern embassies have been swamped with
complaints from tourists and businessmen refused
entry, forced to leave early or stranded at Chinese
borders.

Shortly after September 11, Air China cancelled all
flights to the Middle East and Pakistan, amid security
fears. Israel is particularly annoyed to find itself on
China's blacklist alongside such nations as Iran and
Libya.

Staff at the Grand Hyatt hotel in the city, at the top
of China's highest skyscraper, said: "People from
Middle Eastern countries cannot stay during APEC,
but others like the British are OK."



To: chowder who wrote (9682)10/18/2001 12:59:17 AM
From: Steeliejim  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153
 
You almost made some sense this time until that last sentence. Not smug at all, unless you believe that my being convinced that it is important to look at the consequences of ones actions, and to temper the burn 'em nuke talk is smug.

You apparently are po'd because your bs about no one agreeing with me or caring is proven wrong, not only by the pres., but by some of the posters on this board--and some of the things you said, perhaps in the heat of the moment look pretty rediculous in the rereading. After all, you yourself have done some reconstruction of your message.

And as far as I am concerned, you were the one who misused the purpose of PM's. I'm not going to say anything to you in private that I'm unwilling to say in public, and if you pull the bs you did in another PM, I'll do the same thing again.

And yeah, I hope we succeed in taking out the leadership of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Now, in a word about stocks, I think LPAC is worth taking a look at. I own a bunch starting at 3, and Dale's cost basis is a lot lower. It's an A/D postprocessing house for movies and TV shows. Growing market, and LPAC is getting its share. There's a fair amount of discussion about it on Dale's thread. It's biggest problem is that it is so illiquid.