Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William H Huebl who wrote (55788)	10/18/2001 8:31:04 PM
From: Skeet Shipman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Hi Bill, Do you remember the lead up to October 27, 1997? How was your SCYR at that time? Skeet

To: William H Huebl who wrote (55788)	10/18/2001 9:40:32 PM
From: blitzfund	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Hi Bill I asked ? That is, are you sticking with your SCYR indicator no matter how low we go? even if we fall into your (page 3 and 4 theory)?> Your reply was, "Sure... why not? While most of those in NAS have nasty losses (up to 90% or more) I only have a 10% loss or so. If we do another 1929 number, that may grow to 25% or more... but remember, recovering from THAT is not like recovery from a 95% loss." Now correct me if I have something wrong.... The Nas is down about 66% (I think) from 3/10/00 high and now stands at 1,652.72. On (page 3 and 4 your theory) we could?? go to 500 that would be another 70% drop?? So, to get back to even (if 500 is reached) the Nas would have to rise over 300% WOW!!!. Kind of like the people looking to go back to 3/10/00 from today close. Unfortunately:( Blitz P.S. The point being if you think this, why in the world would you not have a back up plan? Should we start sliding down the slippery slope???? BWDIK