SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (59096)10/18/2001 10:57:12 AM
From: dhellmanRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
re:They ain't copying no Athlon.
VIA's stance is that they have a right to use the P4 bus any way they wish. I don't believe they have taken the same stance with respect to socket-A

dave



To: Tony Viola who wrote (59096)10/18/2001 12:14:59 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Tony, according to the roadmaps at MPF, the C5Y is set for 2003. It won't even be fully .10u, but a combination of .13u and .10u transistors from a TSMC hybrid process. They are far behind in clock speed, far behind in IPC, and they are not catching up any time soon. Just about the only advantage they still have is their extremely small die and power dissipation.

wanna_bmw



To: Tony Viola who wrote (59096)10/18/2001 12:36:45 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
> They ain't copying no Athlon.

Actually, they're not copying the Athlon.

For that matter, VIA is being stupid if they're projecting to use the Netburst platform. I mean, if Intel wins their suit against VIA, then VIA's entire roadmap for 2004 gets thrown into the crapper!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News