To: John Pitera who wrote (4907 ) 10/18/2001 10:07:53 PM From: Louis V. Lambrecht Respond to of 33421 John - Uh? Two big MMs closing their activities on gold? And yet another: Greenspan, O'Neill Press For Derivatives Insolvency Law, allowing dealers to net swap derivatives positions in case of insolvency. news.ino.com Don't bother clicking, this apparently was the only reference to the news and the link won't work anymore.Longer term should be for higher precious metals that is what I read:tocquevillefunds.com The American public, having been suckered into pouring its life savings into a dangerously overvalued stock market, is now being called upon to maintain its unhealthy spending patterns to keep the economy from sinking further. The Fed is targeting equity prices in order to prop up the wealth effect, quite an evolution from its original role of preserving the purchasing power of money. In his May 24th, 2001 speech before the Economic Club of New York, Alan Greenspan said: "Owing to the variable and long lags of monetary policy, the effect of our recent policy initiatives will take time to strengthen financial portfolios and spill over into demand for goods and services." The game plan is clear -- reflate the stock market bubble. Money supply (M-2) is growing at 9.2% year over year, the fastest pace since 1987, the year of the October stock market crash. John Hathaway Good reading also, for a crash course on gold:mips1.net Proponents of gold make their case with the need to return to monetarization of gold. While, IMHO, the US gvt. works in the opposite direction. I wouldn't bet against the US gvt. The "netting " of derivatives is examplative of an action which could be taken to preserve the current gold lending/hedging industry. I also believe we are retesting new lows on gold, but would spread: short USD/ long gold on a middle-term timeframe. IF there is no new regulation in the make. Gold $2400/oz.? sharelynx.net