Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (288)	10/23/2001 1:39:59 PM
From: marynell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

"I beginning to wonder if FGX isn't keeping it . . . " The brokers at Global Resource Investments know Randy and FGX well, and the Global does not see FGX going into production. If Randy would spend $10 million poking holes in the Guatemalan targets, then FGX would soon have a resource of 5 or 6 million extremely low-cost ounces in Mexico and Guatemala, then FGX would be at a price of C$10/share, and they could raise money with minimal dilution. Randy's obsessive frugality is no longer funny, and I'm getting angry.