SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (59850)10/23/2001 9:23:53 PM
From: combjellyRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
"I would not mind at all if AMD came up with a clear standard of performance measurement."

So, what do you want? They have a suite of benchmarks, and a third party to do the evaluations. What else do you think is necessary?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (59850)10/24/2001 12:36:51 AM
From: Ali ChenRespond to of 275872
 
"Heck, even something as simple as SPEC2000int would be fine."

As simple? Man, you are out of touch... 3++ hours
of every run over 12 sub-benchmarks is simple for you,
not counting the trickery of three compilers and
special libraries...

How about Bytemark?

- Ali



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (59850)10/24/2001 10:26:59 AM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
It should be obvious why AMD is not coming up with a standard.

Why should it be obvious. On most benchmarks an Athlon 1800+ runs faster then a P4 1800mhz. On many of them it faster then a P4 2000mhz. It seems to me that AMD is being conservative in their ratings. Or are you talking about leaving themselves a chance to get less conservative in the future should they fall behind?

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News