SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rsi_boy who wrote (60298)10/25/2001 5:08:29 PM
From: dale_laroyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
>(We all know, that in most applications, a 1.2Ghz "celleron" on pc133 would beat a Pentium 4 of any speed on that same memory type)<

I don't! It takes a P4 of only 40% higher clock rate to match the performance of a PIII. A 1.2GHz "Celeron" would not even beat a 1.7 GHz P4.



To: rsi_boy who wrote (60298)10/25/2001 5:12:32 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Rsi_boy, Re: "We all know, that in most applications, a 1.2Ghz "celeron" on pc133 would beat a Pentium 4 of any speed on that same memory type"

Bullsh!t. Check out this review of a 1.2GHz Celeron and the slowest Pentium 4 and memory combination available: 1.5GHz with SDRAM.

xbitlabs.com

The Pentium 4 actually wins on more than a few tests. Unbelievable, isn't it? I'm guessing a 2.0GHz Pentium 4 will do even better.

wanna_bmw


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News