Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (196425)	10/26/2001 4:02:24 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

When there is a discussion taking place I think you will see that I can do fine. My post was in response to your post: "Particular reason? The September 11th attacks! She is the security advisor and I think she failed in her job by not preventing that attack. Simple as that. I really don't know all her qualifications, but there's a big difference between being qualified for a job and doing it well." Would you feel the same way about any appointee in that position? Who do you think would have stopped that attack? How specifically do you blame Rice for not catching it? In other words I think if your reasoning for thinking she is bad at her job is that she did not know of this attack before it happened (which is what you posted) then you are not "reasoning" very well. I can see that you are a person who will make judgements based on very superficial and incomplete information. I have to assume if that is all it takes to convince you of her incompetence then you do not look at the whole picture when forming your opinions. That is why I said that you seem to have poor reasoning skills. And I will stick by my post unless you have other reasons (which you stated you do not) to claim she has performed poorly.