SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (18262)10/27/2001 1:44:32 PM
From: The Freep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Allan, since you have the historical data. . .

The large guys being short implies upside. However, the commercials are still quite net short, at least on the S+P. Admittedly, they've been getting a little less net short, but have far from switched to long. This would still imply downside, yes?

Back in the Spring of 2000, the commercials were short vs the large folks long, correct? What has happened when the two are in sync? Or is it more important to look at directional change rather than total numbers? Are the Large players EVER right? Or is it simply inconclusive here with a slightly bullish POV for the short term?

(And yeah, I know. . . a lot has happened since last Tuesday that mighta scared the Large shorts out of their shorts and whatnot. But we don't know that fer sure, so that's just adding speculation on top of subjectivity.)

Yes, this is far more interesting than work <g>

the freep



To: AllansAlias who wrote (18262)11/3/2001 11:49:22 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
COT Update

Against the US market this week the changes were:

NET
GROUP POSITION CHANGE

Commercials -54,105 + 449
Large - 5,983 +3,607
Small +60,088 -4,056

The Commercials stayed the same. As you can see, the swing was in the Large and Small, but the opposite of last week -- this time the Large got far less short, buying from the Small.

Another reminder that these last 5 weeks is the first time the Large group has been short since going long in the Spring of 2000. They aren't usually right.

Recall that my data is based on virtual S&P contracts by combining the various index futures (DJ, SP+ES, ND+NQ, MD, RL).

(See the message I am replying to for last week's update.)