SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (60660)10/28/2001 12:49:24 AM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: In which earnings reporting period(s) did AMD make these NEXGEN writeoffs?

In early 1996 - and the amounts were small since AMD merged with Nexgen, they didn't buy them. AMD did take accounting charges for costs associated with the merger.

The only significant cost to shareholders was in the form of dilution, since shares were issued to exchange for Nexgen shares.

And that dilution was completely, clearly, honestly, and fully reflected in the all financial statements that followed the merger. There are no other costs from the Nexgen acquisition lurking as goodwill or undepreciated P&E waiting to be expensed.

Compare that Intel's nonsensical addition of nearly $6 Billion of "goodwill" to its balance sheet in under two years. I say nonsensical, because goodwill is basically "brand name" value, the difference between the value of an ongoing business and the pieces that make it up. Intel values at $6 billion the name brands of the worthless dot coms it threw money at during its spending frenzy of the past 2 years - and we both know that the value of those brands is closer to $6 million than $6 Billion.

Between that "goodwill" and the their $5 Billion valuation increase for a plant that's producing 25% less in revenues, Intel has been hiding the $9.5 Billion in losses they've incurred as they attempt to compete with AMD.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (60660)10/29/2001 1:26:18 AM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
There was no need to write off any Nexgen investment because AMD did not spend one cent on Nexgen. It was acquired via a 24% increase in outstanding shares. So, at most, Nexgen cost AMD's original shareholders 24/124 of it's 723m of future earnings.

Now you can stop your childish blabbering about AMD's huge acquisition costs. It appears only Intel knows how to pay top dollar for dogs of companies.

Petz