Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Viisage Technology (VISG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (275)	11/1/2001 3:29:31 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 536

As I'm neither long nor short here, I am enjoying the analysis. I'd like to see some real facts rather than words like "fraud" or "lies" bandied around. Legitimate areas of investigation are how easy their product is to duplicate, how accurate it is, how much revenue they actually get after all licenses, projections to bottom line. Competition, or lack thereof, is very important. Stupid areas that don't shed real light, IMO, are the name calling and also the issue of privacy. Although it might have made for some good debate before 9/11, I don't think that argument holds water and I doubt those who are posting would prevent any technology that works from being used on the grounds of "privacy." The terrorists didn't care about your privacy and they don't care about your civil rights. We need to give up some of those rights, even if we really had the right not to be photographed, which I doubt. Remember, dead men and societies don't have civil rights.