Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (3392)	11/2/2001 12:57:22 PM
From: GraceZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Maybe you missed the part about it raising his costs so much it is coming close to driving him out of the biz. When you own a small business your biggest asset is the income flow that comes from that business, the value of that business if you want to sell it. Its pretty hard to separate yourself, although he has diversified his assets quite a bit he depends on that biz for cash flow. If there was a lawsuit that was bigger and more catastrophic than these nuisance suits the incorporation would certainly have paid for itself, but as it stands now it created the situation he tried to avoid. In America everyone seems to want to sock it to the big corporation and they can't tell the difference between a deep pocketed one and a small family run one. All they know is they think they deserve some of that money because they are poor and someone surely is responsible for that.