Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (61784)	11/2/2001 2:49:55 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

You think wbmw is here to spread the truth or something?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (61784)	11/2/2001 2:55:53 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe, Re: "Over the last year to 18 months, overall, annual number of units sold is down some 20 million. At the same time, AMD unit sales went up from around 6 million to 7.8 million. During this time, Intel claimed they held or gained or held share. Let me be blunt: Intel is lying." Can you show me where Intel has claimed that they have gained or held market share from early 2000? wanna_bmw

To: Joe NYC who wrote (61784)	11/2/2001 3:21:59 PM
From: andreas_wonisch	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe, Re: Intel is lying. That's nothing new for Intel. Did you listen to the Executive Webcast? Otellini claimed that a 2 GHz Pentium 4 is the fastest processor around -- even in many "old" applications. If you are nice you could call this a gross exaggeration otherwise it's just a blunt lie. (Edit: And yes, AMD is also lying sometimes (recall the K6 fiasco), but at least they give more concrete information, e.g. processor shipment numbers or ASPs.) Andreas