SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruce Brown who wrote (48552)11/4/2001 1:59:51 AM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
OJ is available to be one of the three.

If I remember correctly, Gates chooses one, the government chooses one and the two agree on a third person. Which slot would OJ fill? :)

--Mike Buckley



To: Bruce Brown who wrote (48552)11/4/2001 4:42:48 PM
From: hokieharry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Bruce,
I would like to see the running tab total for the last few years of litigation that includes the 18 states involved, all the corporations involved, the government as well as the European costs to date. I think it is a $$ amount number that should be made known to the public for historcial purposes.

Maybe more for repayment to society in general from Mr. Softy than purely historical purposes. MSFT and Mr. Gates might hardly notice it.



To: Bruce Brown who wrote (48552)11/4/2001 7:07:07 PM
From: EnricoPalazzo  Respond to of 54805
 
Maybe now that he was cleared again in yet another case (the latest road rage trial), OJ might be available to serve as one of the three on the "serious oversight" team.

Unlikely. I think that O.J. is far too busy search for the real killer.



To: Bruce Brown who wrote (48552)11/4/2001 7:10:05 PM
From: EnricoPalazzo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
On a more serious side, I would like to see the running tab total for the last few years of litigation that includes the 18 states involved, all the corporations involved, the government as well as the European costs to date.

I actually don't think the costs were that high. I've heard "tens of millions". I know that boies charged a very low rate (something like $50 an hour). Microsoft's costs surely outpaced the govt's by a wide margin. Whether one agreed or disagreed with the case, the actual cost of legal fees was was small potatoes compared to, say, reining in a monopolist or stifling innovation.