Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (200112)	11/5/2001 4:22:31 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

of course he means it.... CC

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (200112)	11/5/2001 4:49:13 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

"Do you mean like this?:" Yet more petty, partisan, whining, anti-American demolib pinheadism...... It depends on what the post is in response to. It drives me crazy to try to debate with the libs on this thread because their positions are usually not based on truth and logic. If an argument is put forth that is based on nothing except the poster's prejudices, then jla's response is very appropriate. My current debate (if you can call it that) with TP is a great example. He will not answer a key question to support his "position" that Bush somehow stole the election that he won, but still puts sticks by his "position" that cannot be supported without that answer. A perfect example of: "partisan, whining, anti-American demolib pinheadism......" That said I am happy to debate issues (in fact I like to), but if you want to join a debate your argument should be based on facts and logic. Not the type of emotion that your posted article articulates. It is un-American to criticize based on personal hatred imo. You may feel differently about this.