SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (63039)11/8/2001 4:29:07 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (7) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe, Re: Your guesses about Thoroughbred availability.

AMD's desktop roadmap slide indicated:

Q4 2001 - M2000 (Palomino)
Q1 2002 - M2200 (Palomino)
Q2 2002 - M2400 (Tbred/Barton)
Q3 2002 - M2600 (Tbred/Barton)
Q4 2002 - M3400 (Hammer)

event.mediaondemand.com

Now, I don't know if these slides are 100% accurate, but they seem to imply that Palomino will get to 1.8GHz. However, it also seems to imply that .13u SOI only gets Barton up to about 2.1GHz. This seems to confirm that AMD is expecting very little mileage left out of K7, even with .13u and SOI.

On the other hand, Hammer seems to imply a combination of frequency and IPC performance to give a ~30% advantage. If we believe that Hammer can get a 15% improvement in frequency (clocking at about 2.4GHz), that gives an estimated 12.5% gain in IPC, which seems reasonable, given the lecture I attended at MPF.

I don't know... I'm just thinking out loud, and figured that you might want to share a thought or two.

wanna_bmw



To: Joe NYC who wrote (63039)11/8/2001 10:20:43 PM
From: Paul EngelRespond to of 275872
 
Re: "sampling: Q4
mobile shipping: Q1 2002
mobile really shipping: Q2 2001
desktop shipping: Q2 2002
desktop really shipping: October 2002?"

Pretty funny - and probably true.