SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fyodor_ who wrote (63184)11/9/2001 10:33:20 AM
From: ElmerRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Do you honestly think the reason those guys voted to ban Paul was because they didn't want to hear dissenting opinions?!? You've gotta be kidding! Dissenting opinions are actually very welcome from a vast majority on this thread - it's the petty trolling, constant abusive tone and down-right mean-spiritedness that makes people want to kick Paul off the thread.

"Ignoring" him would have accomplished that. But then again, then other people could still read his posts. A clear violation of the Maniban thought control.



To: fyodor_ who wrote (63184)11/9/2001 10:36:13 AM
From: Road WalkerRespond to of 275872
 
FYO,

I'll respond to your post because you voted "no".

re: Do you honestly think the reason those guys voted to ban Paul was because they didn't want to hear dissenting opinions?!?

Yes.

John



To: fyodor_ who wrote (63184)11/9/2001 2:30:54 PM
From: maui_dudeRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
fyodor, Re : "Dissenting opinions are actually very welcome from a vast majority on this thread - it's the petty trolling, constant abusive tone and down-right mean-spiritedness that makes people want to kick Paul off the thread."

The related questions to think about :
1. If AMD stock price was at $45 right now, would more people have voted for the ban ?
2. If you replace all of past posts from paul and alter the names from Intel to AMD, AMD to Intel, Jerry-bashing to barrett-bashing, hamster to shitanium, athwiper to willidog etc, and his responses to bill jackson to wanna_bmw and dan3 to Elmer, etc, etc, would more people have voted for the ban ?

I dont think so, in both cases.

The thread is one-sided. If it were not for you, andreas, Kash, Mani, crazy_doug, jamok and about 6-7 more, this thread would be a hardcore cult with zero value to the investor. I dont think the few of you along with some Intellibees (without Paul) make up enough to restore the balance, IMO.

Maui.