Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maui_dude who wrote (63268)	11/9/2001 2:51:17 PM
From: fyodor_	Respond to of 275872

Maui: 2. If you replace all of past posts from paul and alter the names from Intel to AMD, AMD to Intel, Jerry-bashing to barrett-bashing, hamster to shitanium, athwiper to willidog etc, and his responses to bill jackson to wanna_bmw and dan3 to Elmer, etc, etc, would more people have voted for the ban ? I dont think so, in both cases. I am completely and honestly convinced that Paul would have been permanently kicked off this thread long ago had he been an AMD supporter. And, yes, I'm quite serious. -fyo

To: maui_dude who wrote (63268)	11/10/2001 2:59:16 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

maui dude, you disproved your own point: If you replace all of past posts from paul and alter the names from Intel to AMD, AMD to Intel, Jerry-bashing to barrett-bashing, hamster to shitanium, athwiper to willidog etc, and his responses to bill jackson to wanna_bmw and dan3 to Elmer, etc, etc, would more people have voted for the ban? You apparently think NOT, but the truth is, YES, we would have banned such a person. Isn't it interesting that this hypothetical person doesn't exist, since I never heard of shitanium, willidog or anyone else who badgered people like Paul did. EDIT - when the weekend is over, let's get off this pity / righteous-indignation party. Petz