Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cage Rattler who wrote (9825)	11/11/2001 11:58:39 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

A promise not to retaliate under some conditions I was talking about a possible discussion with the government of Pakistan. I was amazed how quickly they decided to be friendly towards the West, and also fire some of its senior officials involved with the Taliban at the very least. I am not an admirer of Clinton, but I don't hate him either. In addition I do not want to discuss his "moral" issue in any detail. Quite honestly I think too many Republican politicians focused on his sexual escapades when they really should have focused on the real issues. The USA will forever crippled as a nation unless the individual sexual habits of politicians are dropped from the top of the agenda. For a start it gives huge amounts of power to the (liberal) press to destroy a politicians reputation by snooping. Just think about that one for a start. If it's any interest to you, Clinton is still well thought of as a politician in this country. As for USA politicians, I prefer Bush so far.