SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dybdahl who wrote (62944)11/13/2001 5:41:03 AM
From: dybdahl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
What people often don't notice about Linux is how fast the evolution goes. Many people still think about Linux as it looked two years ago, with command lines, no applications, long time reboot in case of power failure etc. They also think about what the Linux community did a year ago. Some people even haven't realized that the RSA patents have gone, making kerberos and encryption something that is available in all the Linux programs, even such a small program like command-line FTP.

And they believe that Linux will stay like this for at least a year. That's wrong. A year is a very long time with Linux, almost unpredictably long, as there are numerous examples of.

And since Linux is free, you can always target the newest versions and don't have to support the old versions. Only one server, that my company controls, and that we could imagine to install new software on, hasn't been upgraded to Red Hat 7.2. If a company uses Windows, however, they seldom upgrade all the time, simply because it would be too expensive, both in manpower and software licenses. This is also the reason why NT4 is still a major platform and still is targeted by Windows software vendors.

There are many years technology between NT4/Win95 and now, and as time goes by, this becomes an increasing handicap for Windows. I don't know a single piece of non-Microsoft software, that requires Windows 2000 or later.

Lars.



To: dybdahl who wrote (62944)11/13/2001 2:27:31 PM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
<< One of our customers still has a Pentium 100MHz server with 16MB RAM running. >>

So your comments earlier this year that PC's only needed 16MB of RAM if they run Linux were sort of off track, weren't they?