SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: arun gera who wrote (10319)11/14/2001 11:29:04 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Gotta kill them. If we don't, they're just tomorrow's terrorists.



To: arun gera who wrote (10319)11/14/2001 11:34:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Actually, given that they weren't in any "official" uniform, they can be considered to not enjoy the same specific rights as uniformed soldiers. They could technically be considered "guerillas, spies, or saboteurs".

But that's getting into the technicalities of international law and the Geneva convention...

And the only law that's applicable right now in Kabul is "might makes right" and "do as I say, not as I do".

Otherwise known as the Law of the Jungle..

Hawk



To: arun gera who wrote (10319)11/14/2001 11:43:04 AM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I'm not advocating anything, but I'm sure the NA are not treating the Taliban any worse than they would have been treated if they were captured. That doesn't make it right, but that's the reality in Afghanistan for centuries, long before we got involved.When someone decides to go to war, they ought to expect that getting shot by the opponents is a real possibility. The Geneva convention is nice in theory, but I wonder how many Afghanis have even heard of Geneva, never mind the Geneva convention. Unfortunately for them, some of the Taliban soldiers were forced into fighting for them. The reported skinning alive of prisoners bothers me more than shooting them. How do they do that, anyway? Just curious, I'm not planning on doing any copy catting!



To: arun gera who wrote (10319)11/14/2001 12:01:49 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Is the US shooting POW's?

Is there evidence that the NA is? Could very well be retribution by those who had been tortured, raped, and murdered by the Taliban for the last 2-3 years - particularly in Mazar i sharif...

Do you feel the retreating Taliban shouldn't be attacked by US planes?

After all, they are just "losers"... they should be allowed to peacefully return to their end of the field and kickoff...