Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (148082)	11/14/2001 1:49:41 PM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Tench, ok I know you guys are pretty intelligent. Why are we having these stupid arguments when all the answers are known to all of us? Yes, the P3 has a SLIGHTLY longer pipeline than the Athlon. Not longer enough to give it an edge in frequency. The P4 has DOUBLE the pipeline length compared to the Athlon and surprise, surprise it clocked twice that of the Aluminum P3 and Aluminum Athlon. Before you get going, I know there is no direct ratio to calculate Mhz from the number of pipelines but let's stop here. According to your argument ( and Paul's ) why doesn't the P3 make it to 2Ghz if the aluminum process is so GOOD? Constantine