Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gopher Broke who wrote (64089)	11/20/2001 12:39:37 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Gopher, They must be shipping production units to make a statement like that. Otherwise it would be a bald-faced lie. It would not be the first time. Let's see how this develops. Joe

To: Gopher Broke who wrote (64089)	11/20/2001 4:12:52 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Gopher, Re, Intel definitely said in their last CC that Itanium shipments were starting to contribute to the bottom line, or words to that effect. They must be shipping production units to make a statement like that. Otherwise it would be a bald-faced lie. They didn't say what kind of contribution Itanium was making to the bottom line. It is certainly negative as best I can see. I see no hope for it to become positive in the near future. The difference between a 'Production Unit' and a Sample is the name attached. (I've been involved in software like that ;-].) I've also been wrong before. tgptndr