SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tcmay who wrote (64125)11/20/2001 2:41:20 PM
From: Bill JacksonRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Tim, With higher leakage then the cache ram would need more frequent refresh and that would cut it's performance vis-a-vis the AMD cache.
I am not sure, but I suspect the cache will be DRAM for space saving and not SRAM? is that correct? Or must it be SRAM for raw speed in the case of a CPU and thus needs no refresh?

Paul would still be here if he was as well mannered as you are, Tim.

Bill



To: tcmay who wrote (64125)11/20/2001 2:56:17 PM
From: PetzRespond to of 275872
 
<The spec sheet I saw said 1.7 A, which is more plausible.>
Only at non-operational voltage levels. Take a closer look. The leakage increases exponentially with operating voltage as Ali pointed out.

The claim that Intel's Mobile .13 processors are leaking 17 A at 1.3 volts IS supported at it's rated speed, which requires full Vcc.
Petz



To: tcmay who wrote (64125)11/20/2001 3:23:08 PM
From: Pravin KamdarRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Tim,

You are confusing DRAMs with SRAMs. Dynamic RAMs store a 1 or 0 on the storage cell capacitors (and not necessarily a "positive memory
bit"--a full vs. empty well can be either a 1 or a 0, and may vary from one part of the array to another).


Aaah, that rings a bell. But is cache memory used in processors the type that has to be refreshed? Hey, I never claimed to be a circuit designer (especially digital), even when I was designing them!

Pravin.



To: tcmay who wrote (64125)11/20/2001 6:14:29 PM
From: Ali ChenRespond to of 275872
 
tcmay,"The claim that Intel's Mobile .13 processors are leaking 17 A at 1.3 volts is not supported."

Which claim? What are you smokin? Have you made any
effort to read posts or specs, so you throw the
17A in inflammation?

Intel specs says: P-III-M-0.13u has 8A @1.4V in
deep sleep. This is a lot.

Truely yours,
- Ali, Screwdriver Shop Camel Jockey