Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Viisage Technology (VISG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (387)	11/22/2001 1:25:36 AM
From: afrayem onigwecher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 536

Auric ! What happen to you ??? You must be very desperate ! Desperate people...... do desperate things Have a good holiday and have a nice weekend AH

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (387)	11/22/2001 11:19:19 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 536

As I've posted, I no longer have a position in VISG, having sold at 13 and 15, held it from .82. The post to which I am responding from the legendary (in his own mind) Oral BrownFingers, aptly named because he is a BottomShorter and BS artist<e>, I believe comes close to the line that needs to be evaluated by the SEC. This may be typical bully tactics intending to manipulate that many desperate shorts use. Sometimes desperate shorts even leak information to so-called Press affiliates after establishing positions. IMO, the SEC is investigating these loose associations for behavior that falls within a conspiracy to conduct manipulation covered under the SEC acts and regulations thereunder. Just because a person, without a position in a security, publishes information does not, IMO, protect that person or those who use that information in a manner prohibited under the acts and regulations. Issuing a fake SEC press release with fine print at the end may have some serious consequences and, at least, is a violation of SI TOS. Others, more knowledgable than I, have pointed out this poster's so-called use of the nom de plum by multiple individuals and the use of the name by an affiliated broker-dealer and/or alleged hedge fund operator to promote that affiliate's agenda and position. As I have no position in this at this time, I urge others to carry on against manipulative activities. All the above is my opinion solely. PS. I suspect the offending post will be pulled by the coward so copies should be made.