SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (149359)11/25/2001 7:09:34 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
<Re: a, b, c>

Hard to tell. There was a now famous Intel paper (too lazy to look it up) that was trying to prove that SOI's benefits gradually disappear with every generation beyond 180nm. The authors were concentrating on frequency scaling IIRC, but did not look closely at power and leakage issues with bulk SI. The paper was written just over a year ago. Something happen between then and now for Intel to start looking at SOI again. So I think the most likely answer is (a).

Kap



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (149359)11/26/2001 11:26:46 AM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
bmw
re: maintain a leadership position
tell me how is that no matter how intel may screw-up, intelabee would use a word "leadership" anyway.

intel showed it's leadership by rejecting ddr in favour of rambus
intel showed it's leadership by rejecting rambus in favour of ddr
intel showed it's leadership by choosing not to use soi
intel showed it's leadership by choosing to use soi

what a "LEADERSHIP"? :-))

Regards
-Albert


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News