SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (149411)11/26/2001 12:29:01 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Intel does not have a leakage problem"

Intel does not have a leakage problem, yet 0.13 P-III
draws around 10A in static case, out of 20A total when
switching at 1.13GHz?

Intel does not have a leakage problem while spending extra
millions of R&D $$$ for development of new transistors that
addresses explicitly the leakage problem?

Yet you and Paul say "Intel does not have a leakage problem".
Now that is a bold statement, do not you think?

- Ali



To: Elmer who wrote (149411)11/26/2001 8:47:23 AM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer, I won't pretend I understand all of it but from following the Discussion between Ali and you guys and by reading the Intel spec on the P3, I agree with Ali.

C

p.s.
I just read the Intel release about the terahertz transistor. It seems to me that the leakage problem in .13 is real and Intel send off a bunch of researchers to try and fix it and in doing that they came up with the stuff they describe in their press release.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News