SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (149450)11/26/2001 12:42:25 AM
From: Robert Salasidis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
And the Athlon4 extrapolated to 0 Hz leaks the same amount on a 0.18u process.

Therefore Intel has no more of a leakage problem than anyone else packing a wallop of transistors on a small chip.

Maybe AMD will need SOI just to keep their leakage within the Intel range when they shrink to 0.13u



To: Ali Chen who wrote (149450)11/26/2001 12:42:28 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ali, Re: "At the nominal operating voltage, both -S and -M leak about the same current, 9.5A and 8.04 A correspondingly. Actually, the extrapolation of mobile Icc data to 0 MHz gives 9.38A too."

Thanks for clarifying that.

So do you have any theories about the discrepancies between both designs, yet?

Message 16682747

Or it might still be possible that we are both misreading the specs?

Message 16681513

wbmw


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News