Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (38832)	11/26/2001 5:16:27 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

It is likely that they rfined their plans, learned to plug leaks and to take steps that made it easier to fly those airliners into the WTC on the second try with sickening consequences..... I support the tribunals for the same reason. I can appreciate the downside, though. It seems like there ought to be a way to jigger either the civil or military court system to protect against divulging classified info, protect juries, and protect us against lawyers who are not acting if good faith as officers of the court. I just had a wild idea. We try them by tribunal but dispense with the death penalty, then let them appeal to a civil court later when the crisis is over. That might satisfy everybody. Even X said that she'd be OK with postponing trials until such time as they could be safely held. This way we only delay access to civil courts to those who are found guilty by the tribunal. Karen