Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (38943)	11/27/2001 10:21:11 AM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

a lecture from JLA on being derogatory. Specialist subject of expertise? I mean, who better? {what IS it today with the feed lines...?}

To: Lane3 who wrote (38943)	11/27/2001 10:26:29 AM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

:) A thing a friend says to me crossed my mind, "kindness begets kindness". Now, as a sometimes-cynic, I don't think it always does, but it's a good notion. Certainly deriding and calling names doesn't beget kindness, except maybe in those who agree with the names and derision. But... I do wonder about the idea of a friend "smirking" at a friend. I just find smirking really annoying. And affectionate teasing is a long ways, or maybe a short hop, from "mildly insulting" a friend, or anyone else. Eek. I don't much care to hang out with people who insult me. And it doesn't take a great depth of sensitivity to expression to know when someone says something about your pants hanging down whether they are being insulting or teasing you with affection. The former means they really hate your pants and think you look stupid, the latter means they like ya just the way you are but can't help but laugh over your pants hanging down. Maybe that doesn't explain it well, but is the drift there? And thanks to both you and TS for your responses yesterday about the MJ question. They made sense, even if I don't fully agree. :) I would pick someone like Donald Trump as self-absorbed and wanting an exact copy of himself. And someone who is cruel to children as someone not fit to have them.

To: Lane3 who wrote (38943)	11/27/2001 11:16:11 AM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

And here I thought TIME magazine's recent declaration that irony was dead was the final word on the matter. TTFN!