Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (11887)	11/29/2001 2:48:49 AM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Thus, it's perfectly legal, and constitutional<< Hawk It has yet to be tested, constitutionally. And the proposed tribunals have markedly different rules than those you mentioned, so the precedence is thin at best. I concur that the leadership will most likely not live to see a courtroom, which is peachy by me. As for morality, the point in war is not to be right, but to outlast the other side and to be effective. But the point in being a USA citizen, to me, is the recognition that, like all civilizations, we are not static. I will continue to pursue a nation that always aims to be better than it was the day before, while remaining effective. And I strongly believe it can be done without jury-riggi... I mean, tribunals.