SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (29450)11/29/2001 1:32:00 AM
From: FR1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
interest rates left to market forces would actually be higher

That's true and in early 2000 the banks were raising rates because they did not like the risk they were seeing. But that does not mean that the FED needs to step in and try to force rates in one direction or the other.

IMHO the FED should not try to intervene in the economy unless there is dire emergency (like war or inflation that is out of control). Instead, the FED thinks it is their duty to control the economy. Consequently we live in a government controlled economy and not a market economy. They pushed rates up to 6.5% and held them there even though most business leaders were screaming about the disaster it would cause. The FED wanted to see massive layoffs because they thought low unemployment would bring on inflation.

You know it is a keystone cops out-of-control world when the FED says the correct interest rate is 6.5% and later in the same year says the correct rate is 2.0%.