SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4806)11/29/2001 8:13:14 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
I did a little bit of bolding in this article to emphasize one of the fatal flaws of our tax code. Trying to "micro manage" our economy with incentives and disincentives. Of course the law makers are usually wrong since they're looking in the rear view mirror. Their solutions are usually "too little, too late". Better to quit meddling with free enterprise.

Look To Hong Kong For Flat Tax Evidence

The flat tax is alive and well and living in Hong Kong. And the benefits for taxpayer and government alike are enormous.

On nearly every score, Hong Kong's tax system eradicates or avoids distortions so common everywhere else:

Although there are four levels of income tax -- from two percent to 20 percent -- the system is structured so that no one need pay more than 15 percent of income to the government.

There is no tax on capital gains or interest.

Corporate profits are taxed at a flat 16.5 percent.

The form Hong Kong taxpayers fill out every year is four pages long -- but that's only because it's printed in both English and Chinese.
Far from hurting the middle class, as flat tax critics in the U.S. keep warning, Hong Kong's effective 15 percent flat tax does not even kick in until people's incomes put them well into the middle class.

More than half of Hong Kong's citizens pay no tax at all.

Almost all the rest pay only seven percent of their income to government.

Nearly 75 percent of tax revenue comes from the wealthiest 10 percent of the population.

Even at that, the colony consistently runs a budget surplus in the billions of dollars.

Authorities estimate that by the time Hong Kong is handed over to China in mid-1997, the national coffers will hold more than $40 billion.
From its inception after World War II, Hong Kong's tax system was never meant to be anything other than a source of revenue. Concepts like redistribution of income are absent. There aren't any of those deductions and penalties that turn tax codes elsewhere into social engineering documents.

Source: Editorial, "An 'Untested' Flat Tax," Wall Street Journal, February 9, 1996.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4806)11/29/2001 8:15:57 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
I am not an expert on different tax scenarios, so don't hold me to this, but my understanding of a VAT is that we would end up paying more overall as taxes. We may only see 15% on the end product, but the manufacture paid 15% for the components, and the component makers paid 15% for the raw materials etc.... Those taxes are then passed down to us as an increase in the price of the end product.