SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cactus Jack who wrote (44610)11/30/2001 8:24:45 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 65232
 
Great! I use ATHM's service through AT&T's cable modem.

I guess I'm screwed until they can get a new network up & running. Oh well.............. see ya all around sometime..........

Help me! I'm fading...........................

OOF :-|



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (44610)11/30/2001 9:47:41 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
ExciteAtHome Cleared to Disconnect

Friday November 30 8:23 PM ET

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer

<<SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A judge said bankrupt ExciteAtHome could turn off its high-speed cable Internet service this weekend, which could affect more than 4 million subscribers around the country.

Lawyers for the cable companies that connect their customers to the AtHome network said they planned to appeal the decision to U.S. District Court in San Francisco. Meanwhile, both sides continued to negotiate in order to reach an agreement that would keep the service running.

Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Carlson said Redwood City-based ExciteAt Home could reject its existing contracts with the cable companies as early as 3 a.m. EST Saturday.

The judge was unmoved by the argument that he shouldn't close down the network because it would affect consumers.

``The end users may be affected by these proceedings, but they are not parties to these proceedings,'' Carlson said. ``Bankruptcy typically causes much disruption all the time, leading to loss of jobs and services to communities.''

The ruling affects many of the nation's largest cable companies, including AT&T, Comcast Corp. and Cox Communications Inc., that sell Internet access through AtHome's network.

Carlson gave ExciteAtHome the leeway to end the contracts after concluding they had become ``clearly burdensome'' to the company. Under the contracts, ExciteAtHome executives said the company was losing up to $6 million per week.

ExciteAtHome wants the cable companies to pay a substantially higher connection fee to use its network. Until ExciteAtHome's bankruptcy, the cable companies had been paying a monthly fee of $12 per subscriber. Last month, the cable companies agreed to increase the monthly fee to $20 per subscriber.

The cable companies typically charge their customers $40 to $50 per month to use the AtHome network.

By forcing the cable companies to pay even more to use the high-speed Internet service, ExciteAtHome and the company's bondholders hope to prove the network is worth substantially more than the $307 million that AT&T has bid for it.

The bondholders have accused AT&T of using its controlling position on ExciteAtHome's board to steer the company into bankruptcy as part of a scheme to buy one of the nation's biggest high-speed Internet networks at a bargain price. AT&T has denied the allegations.

Comcast, Cox and Insight Communications had put together an offer to outbid AT&T, but withdrew the proposal when Carlson refused to delay Friday's hearing, said Charles Cohler, an attorney for Comcast. Cohler didn't provide details of the offer.

The bid wasn't substantially higher that AT&T's, said Don Morgan, managing director of Mackay Shields, one of ExciteAtHome's largest bondholders.

The uncertain fate of ExciteAtHome's network could be resolved quickly if the cable companies agreed to share more of the revenue generated by customer subscriptions, Morgan said.

``There is a simple solution to this problem. Money makes this problem go away. Subscribers need to realize that they are paying $50 a month for this service, but (ExciteAtHome) is seeing very little of that,'' he said.

Lawyers for the cable companies have equated ExciteAtHome's tactics to blackmail.

The bondholders ``seek to play a 'game of chicken' in which the threat of a blackout is used to extort the (cable companies) into paying yet more for AtHome's services,'' AT&T said in a brief leading up to Friday's hearing.



If ExciteAtHome pulls the plug on its service, the high-speed network will become even less valuable, cable company lawyers contended in Friday's hearing.

``This will kill its value as a going concern,'' said Cohler, who likened the possible shutdown to a ``murder-suicide.''

The cable companies have been warning customers during the past few days that the high-speed service might be disrupted, but their contingency plans remain sketchy. Some are offering access to dial-up Internet service - an unacceptable option for many customers accustomed to high-speed access.

``If they shut down, I will start looking for another service as soon as possible,'' said AtHome subscriber Todd Ambur of Fremont. ``I need Internet service all the time and there is no way I am going back to dial-up modems.''

Lauren Adair of Philadelphia said her home business would suffer if she loses AtHome's high-speed service.

``My work would suffer if I had to dial-up every 15 minutes to check my e-mail, and downloading files would take forever,'' she said.

Cox is ``trying to do everything we can to make sure our customers get uninterrupted service,'' company spokeswoman Susan Leepson said Friday. Cox has about 550,000 AtHome customers, with the largest concentration in the San Diego and Phoenix markets.

Officials at Comcast and AT&T did not return calls seeking additional comment. A statement on the Comcast Web site said that negotiations were continuing and that it was not aware of any planned termination in service.

In a letter to Carlson before the hearing, Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) Chairman Michael Powell urged the court to provide for an ``orderly transition'' in the event it decided to discontinue service, ``rather than a precipitous shutdown.''

Carlson expressed confidence his ruling would force the cable companies and ExciteAtHome to settle on new terms before the network was disconnected.

``It is obvious the cable companies are vitally interested in keeping the service alive,'' Carlson said. ``It is reasonable to assume these sophisticated parties will find a way to share the value of (AtHome's) continued operations.''>>



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (44610)12/1/2001 6:20:42 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
ExciteAtHome goes down to the wire

Millions of users wait to see if their Net access disappears

By Bambi Francisco, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:59 AM ET Dec. 1, 2001

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- A federal appellate panel Friday night refused to enter the fray over the future of ExciteAtHome's Internet service, leaving 3.7 million subscribers wondering whether they'd wake up Saturday without Net access.

Federal Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Carlson on Friday afternoon gave At Home the green light to let its deals with cable companies expire at midnight.

And just hours before the deadline, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Pasadena, Calif., denied the cable companies' request to stay Carlson's order.

Carlson said the companies should negotiate new deals and urged them to do so without interrupting service, but At Home's creditors said they'd pull the plug unless cable companies agreed to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to buy what's left of the troubled At Home business.

Those negotiations were going on late into the evening.

Carlson OK'd a motion by At Home and its bondholders to reject current contracts with cable companies. But he also said "rejection does not require shutdown of the service" and said it was reasonable to assume that cable companies and At Home would reach a new contract.

"We're meeting with all cable companies to avoid shutdown of the system," said Robert White, attorney for At Home.

"We hope the cable companies make an offer that's close to fair market value. Otherwise the service goes black at midnight," said Neal Goldman, chairman of the bondholders committee.

Seeking a sweetened bid

Fair market value, according to the creditors, is far more than the $307 million AT&T (T: news, chart, profile) has agreed to pay for At Home. The offer, which was set for hearing next week, was taken off the calendar because the bondholders were not in support of it, said White.

William Weintraub, an attorney for the creditors, said they want a sale to recover at least the $747 million creditors put into the company in 1998 and 1999 and perhaps a total of $1 billion to cover additional expenses.

He said AT&T's offer of $307 million had been topped Thursday by a higher offer from Comcast (CMCSK: news, chart, profile), but that the Comcast offer was rejected by bondholders as still not being large enough. Both Weintraub and Comcast's attorney declined to give further details. AT&T and Comcast are among the cable companies whose customers get high-speed Internet service from At Home.

At Home's attorney doesn't expect the cable companies to make a higher offer. "They're not interested in purchasing the system; they're building out their own," said White.

"It was short-sighted of AT&T and the cable partners to let this happen," said Mark Kersey, broadband industry analyst at ARS Inc. "I don't blame At Home, they've run out of money. But I can't believe the large cable companies will allow the service to be shut down."

According to Howard Steinberg, Charter Communications' attorney, the cable companies are waiting for AtHome to come up with a "counterproposal" that all parties could agree upon in order to keep the system running. "The cable partners have offered to extend the $20 per subscriber paid to At Home to avoid interruption of service. This was not accepted," he said.

The cable partners charge subscribers $40-$50 per month. According to the bondholders' attorneys, passing along $20 of that to At Home allows the Internet service to just break even.

AtHomeless playing cards

At the hearing in San Francisco on Friday, representatives of ExciteAtHome (ATHMQ: news, chart, profile) and its bondholders asked for permission to shut down the service and remove themselves from prior contracts in a bid for a larger sales price. .

Attorneys for the creditors argued that AtHome loses $6 million per week to run the service. The judge agreed that the contracts were unprofitable and said At Home should "be free to renegotiate the best terms."

"The estate is seriously insolvent," Carlson said. At Home is "threatening to seize operations ... they do so because it's a wasting one." This is reasonable, the judge said.

Carlson dismissed Cox Communications' argument that subscribers had the right to be heard. Their argument was "unpersuasive," he said, in part because they're not a party to the bankruptcy proceeding.

"Neither side is being the good guy in all of this. Collectively, they're using customers as the playing cards," said Walter Janowski, an analyst at Gartner Inc.

On Sept. 28, At Home entered Chapter 11 and announced that it would sell its assets to AT&T.

Bondholders claim that At Home used the money to develop its business of providing high-speed Internet access to the cable companies. Yet At Home never tried to obtain its full value of the assets by having an "honest auction" with more than one bidder and telling AT&T, Cox and Comcast that they will lose the service unless they come up with an appropriate value, according to a motion filed by bondholders.

Alternative solutions

Late Friday, AT&T said it's prepared to move its customers to a new network in one to 14 days, if necessary. The company will issue credits to customers who have service cut off.

AT&T had already informed its customers that there will be an alternative plan. "As a precautionary measure, AT&T Broadband also has been building its own network and service in the event that AT&T is unable to purchase the ExciteAtHome network," according to an AT&T Broadband letter sent to subscribers.

Comcast (CMCSK: news, chart, profile) contacted its customers saying, "We also have been working to develop a Comcast-managed network that will provide you the always-on cable-powered, high-speed Internet service you've come to enjoy."

And it appears that Cox (COX: news, chart, profile) is also prepared to offer its customers an alternative service.

Even if At Home is sold for $307 million, it would be a far more substantial figure than the $10 million InfoSpace paid for certain Excite assets, including the database of users who have personalized the Excite home page.
_____________________
Bambi Francisco is Internet editor of CBS.MarketWatch.com, based in San Francisco.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (44610)12/1/2001 2:24:34 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
AT&T should take A LOT of the blame for the way the @Home fiasco has been handled...

Message 16731898

BTW, IMO the Judge that made the decision yesterday may be less than honorable <G>...Why is he choosing to favor bondholders over the interests of customers? IMO, the FCC and Federal Government should have compelled @Home to keep the Internet service running throughout the negotiations and during 'a reasonable transition'...Oh well, the window of opportunity has been lost. I'm exploring alternatives to @Home and am one of the millions of customers that may consider switching to another service provider. I feel sorry for the many small businesses and schools that are impacted by this service interruption. AT&T is trying to watch out for its shareholders a lot more than its customers -- then again, what would you expect from them...? I plan to switch my long distance service and my cell phone service to other providers in the next few months. There is nothing like an unsatisfied customer --> the Giant has been Awakened and I am about ready to email AT&T's top management team and let them know how I feel.

Oh well, I hope everyone has a good weekend.

Best Regards,

Scott



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (44610)12/1/2001 8:21:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Excite@Home pulls plug on AT&T; more could go dark

By Rachel Konrad
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
December 1, 2001, 4:15 p.m. PT

update At least one cable partner of Excite@Home has terminated high-speed Internet access to its customers in wake of a Friday court ruling that threatened to shut down the service, and others may be preparing to do the same thing.

AT&T and Excite@Home confirmed Saturday afternoon that most of the 850,000 AT&T cable modem subscribers around the country were without high-speed Internet access.

AT&T said it had transfered about 10 percent of its Excite@Home customers--all of them in Oregon and southwest Washington state--to an independent AT&T service, but it didn't have immediate alternatives for the remaining 90 percent.
"AT&T continued negotiations with At Home Corporation late into Friday evening and early Saturday morning only to see the Excite@Home service cut off," AT&T Broadband said in a statement. In a separate statement, Excite@Home said it was continuing to negotiate with all its remaining cable partners, including Cox Communications and Comcast.

The announcement came as no surprise to AT&T Broadband customers, most of whom woke up Saturday morning to find that they couldn't send e-mail or surf the Web from their high-speed connections. Many had to rely on slower dial-up connections to access information on AT&T's Web site, but it contained no service updates.

AT&T representatives staffing a toll-free hotline--which was bombarded with callers and often busy or unavailable--told customers who could get through that service was disconnected at 2:15 a.m. PT. Call center agents also told subscribers that their service would not be restored for "a few weeks," possibly until AT&T can provide Internet access without the help of Excite@Home's infrastructure.

According to AT&T, customers in Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Connecticut, Pittsburgh, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, Seattle and the San Francisco Bay Area will be transferred to its new network in the next two to 10 days. Some customers in Michigan and the Rocky Mountain region will also be switched to the new network. AT&T warned that customers "may experience temporary service disruption during the migration."

Numerous people told CNET News.com that AT&T representatives were calling them at home on Saturday morning and afternoon to alert them to the outage. AT&T is offering customers two days of credit for each day they are without high-speed Internet access.

But the courtesy may not compensate for the outrage that many customers feel toward both Excite@Home and AT&T. AT&T is offering customers free dial-up service from AT&T Broadband if their service goes down--but the conventional connection is painfully slow for people who have grown accustomed to high-speed cable modems, especially for downloading.

Customers must also change e-mail addresses because of the switch. According to AT&T, e-mail domain names will automatically change from (username)@home.com or similar addresses to (username)@attbi.com.

The changes--and lack of advance notice--offended many customers.

"I managed to reach AT&T Broadband support this morning after about 40 tries and they confirmed Excite@Home service was disconnected," said Mark J. Welch, an AT&T subscriber in Pleasanton, Calif. "Oddly enough, the people at that same number had assured me on Friday afternoon at 3 p.m. that any rumors about service were false, and there was no possibility of an outage, and my e-mail address would continue to work."

AT&T is one of many cable companies that partnered with Excite@Home to provide 4.1 million customers high-speed Internet access.

Customers who rely on Excite@Home and other cable companies, such as Comcast and Cox Communications, also reported outages on Saturday, but those customers did not receive phone calls or e-mail from their providers that service was out or would be resumed eventually.

Meanwhile, other cable partners were preparing customers of the potential for disrupted service in case Excite@Home ended all negotiations and cancelled service to all cable partners. St. Louis-based Charter Communications announced Saturday afternoon that it was switching all 450,000 Charter@Home customers to Charter's independent high-speed Internet service, Charter Pipeline.

Dave Barford, executive vice president and chief operating officer for Charter, said technicians have been preparing for such a move for months but only began switching customers immediately after Friday's court ruling. Charter has already switched 90 percent of its customer to its own pipeline. Those who still have Excite@Home service may experience temporary outages and slowdowns but will soon be switched, Barford said.

"Crews worked through the night to make the transition with minimal disruption to customers," Barford said. "We are still working on some minor issues, but the process went even better than we had hoped."

Fallout from court
Termination of service for AT&T customers began early Saturday morning, less than 24 hours after a key court decision that threatened to terminate service for Excite@Home customers.

On Friday, a San Francisco bankruptcy court judge ruled that angry bondholders and cable partners of Excite@Home must go back to the bargaining table. In the weeks leading up to the decision, the cable companies threatened to cut off service if their contracts, which expired at midnight Friday, were terminated.

The cable companies are upset about having to renegotiate contracts in large part because they fear that the new contracts will siphon revenue from them toward Excite@Home, which filed for bankruptcy protection in October. By some estimates, Excite@Home is burning through $6 million per week because of outdated contracts with the cable companies.

Although the contracts are complicated documents and vary widely depending on the cable partner, the agreements are weighted in the cable companies' favor. With the average cost of Excite@Home service around $46, the cable companies collect roughly 65 percent of that, while Excite@Home collects only 35 percent.

Interim contracts that parties negotiated in October are slightly different than the official contracts that are now being renegotiated, but the interim agreements still funnel a disproportionate amount of money toward cable companies. Contracts are also slightly different in Canada, where cable companies take as much as 80 percent of the revenue, leaving only 20 percent for Excite@Home.

Because Excite@Home filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Thomas Carlson said Friday that Excite@Home may legally break its existing contracts to increase its chances of survival. He rejected the cable companies' argument that the contracts should be maintained to preserve the Internet service of 4.1 million customers, who represent 45 percent of the cable modem users in North America.

Some sources have said that the cable companies are negotiating to extend their existing contracts at least through next week, when AT&T, which has a 79 percent voting interest in Excite@Home, is expected to make a $307 million bid for Excite@Home's cable assets. If and when the sale is finalized, AT&T could renegotiate contracts with the other cable providers.

Many Excite@Home shareholders and creditors say the company's cable assets are worth vastly more than $307 million--some insisting that fair market value is as high as $1 billion. AT&T may be terminating its service in order to make customers defect--a move that would devalue Excite@Home and make AT&T's $307 million bid seem more appealing, critics say.

AT&T Broadband representatives said this week they could assume about 20 percent of Excite@Home customers if the company shuts off service. Excite@Home has been in meetings for the past several weeks with AT&T as well as other cable companies.

The last chapter in a long history
AT&T's $307 million bid--as well as the termination of its service to customers--is the latest chapter in the tortured relationship between AT&T and Excite@Home.

Redwood City, Calif.-based Excite@Home became the largest Internet company when it was formed in a $6.7 billion merger of Web portal Excite and cable company @Home in January 1999. It remains one of the most high-profile and strained marriages of the Old and New Economies, with AT&T owning the majority of Excite@Home's outstanding stock. Both companies share several board members--and executives at both companies have been vocal in their disdain for those at the other company.

Basking Ridge, N.J.-based AT&T, which inherited its @Home stake and board representation from its acquisition of cable TV leader Tele-Communications Inc., opposed the very creation of Excite@Home.

AT&T had been a shareholder in the cable company for only a few months before its directors voted to acquire Excite--a second-tier Internet portal whose dot-com culture contrasted starkly with Ma Bell's conservative sensabilities.

Frustration with former Excite@Home CEO Tim Jermoluk became clear at a meeting in March 1999 in the boardroom of AT&T's headquarters in New York, when several directors suggested spinning off Excite as a separate company--essentially undoing the merger only two months after the deal had closed. Clashes between Jermoluk and then-AT&T cable chief Leo Hindery, who adamantly opposed the merger, are legendary among executives at both companies.

AT&T wasn't the only problem Excite@Home had to face. Since its inception, it has operated under an awkward ownership and governance structure that included significant input from three major cable operators: AT&T, Cox and Comcast. As a result of the complicated ownership structure, Excite@Home has appeared unfocused and divided. More bickering between AT&T Chief Executive C. Michael Armstrong and Hindery over the direction Excite@Home should take--and the role content should play--left the access provider adrift among the big cable operators' vast assets.

Boardroom divisiveness escalated in March 2000, when Ma Bell assumed majority control of Excite@Home's board of directors and offered to buy the stakes of co-partners Comcast and Cox. At that point, AT&T had a 23 percent ownership stake in Excite@Home and a 74 percent voting stake.

In January, AT&T traded $2.9 billion in its stock for the ownership stakes that competing cable operators Cox and Comcast held. That deal boosted AT&T's stake to 38 percent. AT&T also took a 79 percent voting interest in the broadband Net access company.

Some insiders say AT&T's heavy stake in the company compromised the board's decision-making abilities and took the focus away from Excite@Home shareholders.

Some Excite@Home insiders blame the company's plight squarely on cultural clashes between AT&T's "cable guys" and Excite@Home's more informal, younger executives. In fact, Excite@Home's October bankruptcy filing was part of a deal with AT&T. The agreement called for Excite@Home to become wholly owned by the long-distance giant by early 2002, pending approval by the bankruptcy court.

At the time of the bankruptcy filing, AT&T said that it will use Excite@Home's assets as the core of a larger broadband network. AT&T insisted customers would not experience an interruption in service.

"AT&T remains committed to working with Excite@Home's management and the bankruptcy court to provide uninterrupted high-speed cable Internet service to existing Excite@Home customers, as well as continuing relationships with other cable companies to ensure seamless service to their customers on the @Home network," the company said in a statement on Oct. 1.