SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (4926)12/3/2001 1:44:13 PM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
He should be treated a little different. He should have treason added to whatever the Talibums would be charged with. If that POS isn't the definition of treason I don't know what is IMO.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (4926)12/3/2001 1:48:05 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
That was more or less my point. If he was affiliated with Bin Laden or Al Queda, then he should be treated as the other foreigners. If, OTOH, he was just involved with the Taliban, with no specific terrorist affiliation, I'm not sure what the grounds would be to prosecute him. His biggest exposure would probably involve having been involved in the prison uprising where an American CIA agent was killed.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News