SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maried. who wrote (20952)12/4/2001 9:18:04 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
When an American travels to another country and gets caught breaking the law, it's always the other country that tries and and decides the punishment. This case is no different. Let the NA do what they want with him.



To: maried. who wrote (20952)12/4/2001 10:25:32 AM
From: Nite-Man  Respond to of 59480
 
The talking heads last night mentioned that he should be put on trial for "sedition". Because we haven't declared war on Afghanistan, he couldn't be put on trial for treason.

Maried,

I think I was watching the same show or something similar and the "talking head" was of the opinion that he should be tried in Federal court with the crime of sedition, which carries the death penalty. However, I agree with you that leaving him to the NA would be preferable.

Best regards,

NM



To: maried. who wrote (20952)12/4/2001 10:34:57 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
There is no requirement for a congressional declaration of war to indict for treason. The talking head was talking from his a$$.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News