SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (151418)12/6/2001 6:43:42 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tenchusatsu, Re: "I can almost guarantee that a 1.4 GHz P4 has a shorter latency (in terms of # of clock cycles) than a 2.0 GHz P4."

I don't disagree with your conclusion, but just where did you come up with this?

wbmw



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (151418)12/6/2001 6:52:57 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tenchusatsu,

Uh, no. I can almost guarantee that a 1.4 GHz P4 has a shorter latency (in terms of # of clock cycles) than a 2.0 GHz P4. But the bandwidth per clock is constant.

How can this be? Can you explain? These are identical processors. The L2 latency depends on the speed of the logic and it is completely in the are of the chip which runs at frequency set by the multiplier. You set multiplier to 14 on one, 20 to another. How can the latency be any different in terms of clock cycles? Am I missing something?

Even if the decoders ran at half-speed, I don't think that would make a difference in performance as long as the decoders did double the work every other main clock. In theory, you should be able to fetch and decode more instructions per clock than you can execute. So if you're going to architect a split-clock processor, it makes sense to speed up just the execution side of the pipeline instead of the whole processor.

Theoretically yes, you can have 2 decoders. But P4 has only one that can process one instruction per cycle. That's what the spec says.

Joe