SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: advocatedevil who wrote (57196)12/11/2001 4:29:07 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Ad,
You and i are thinking alike. See my last two posts regarding merck and p&g. And i agree with Sam, your lack of trading is making my vicarious trading self sad. Take your loss and start banging away again. <g> By the way, does anyone think TSM reported buy from amat is important. Stock was at 45 and change when that rumor became overshadowed by Mercks cancellation of amat order. <g> mike



To: advocatedevil who wrote (57196)12/11/2001 4:29:35 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Somebody probably found out that Merck is going to buy zero equipment from AMAT next year! <g>



To: advocatedevil who wrote (57196)12/11/2001 4:42:05 PM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
AD,

That was quite a steep sell-off in the last hour. Do you really think that it had anything to do with MRK? Do you consider trading patterns during certain portions of the day (the close, for example) as being any more "significant" than those at other times of the day?

Glad to hear the "phantom" account is doing well.<g>

Sam


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News