SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (152211)12/12/2001 12:09:41 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Just as an example they may have decided that given the risk, AMD would have to go below $25 to make them a better deal than using Intel at $35. "

I guess anything is possible. Doesn't make it likely, though. But, hey, if you want to believe differently, so be it.

Just out of curiosity, why are you any different than Dan3? This argument is just as contrived.



To: Elmer who wrote (152211)12/12/2001 1:52:25 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 186894
 
>Even if this was true, what makes you think that Intel's price was below AMD's price. Just as an example they may have decided that given the risk, AMD would have to go below $25 to make them a better deal than using Intel at $35.

That's not a bad point, i just don't see that much risk here.

-Z


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News