Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (65511)	12/12/2001 3:35:22 PM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Billions down the toilet.. I will LMAO that day. M.

To: combjelly who wrote (65511)	12/12/2001 3:40:45 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

cj, Realize though, an Intel X86-64 will not appear until Intel decides to pull the plug on Itanium. Because that is what will happen. What do you think about my theory of the mother of all lawsuits that would follow the cancelation of Itanium? I think the better idea would be to starve Itanium of resources, not make it attractive, and run the program to the ground gradually. Afterall, Intel version of x86-64 will not happen overnight. If the word gets out of Intel x86-64, it would greatly expedite the death of Itanium. Joe

To: combjelly who wrote (65511)	12/12/2001 3:44:22 PM
From: chuckles58	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

"an Intel X86-64 will not appear until Intel decides to pull the plug on Itanium" I thought this was their fastest ramp of a 64 bit processor.<ggg> CB