SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (209351)12/12/2001 8:05:47 PM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
A personal decision.eom



To: Srexley who wrote (209351)12/12/2001 8:12:53 PM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
No one has suggested it. But innocent people are dying. I'm not complaining, I'm simply pointing out that on one hand we seem easily able to justify the death of innocents when it is war. But if a woman thinks her life as she knows it is coming to an end because of a pregnancy, nobody cares, at least the antichoice people don't seem too, imo.



To: Srexley who wrote (209351)12/12/2001 9:18:25 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 769670
 
a lot of you antichoice people don't seem to have a problem dropping bombs on innocent children"

Actually I was talking to a Republican now former friend last month who said it didn't matter that 7 million women and children in Afghanistan will starve to death this winter. I think that's an abomination, but this person started getting on my case because I thought it abhorrent.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News