SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (65590)12/13/2001 12:28:41 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Andreas,

Mosesmann must have confused cause and effect. AMD isn't enjoying high Athlon XP demand because Intel can't supply.

Couldn't agree more. The shortage of P4 is the direct result of the fact that Intel's perfected P6 core is not competitive with Athlon, and Intel is forced to turn to an "experimental" first generation of Willamette core to supply the mainstream demand.

The future "shortages" at Intel are a function of how competitive AMD is. If AMD can switch to .13 and deliver a boost of some 300 MHz, all of Intel's .18u capacity would become obsolete overnight, and Intel would have to deliver all the processors on .13u process, which can't happen overnight, resulting in more "shortages".

Joe



To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (65590)12/13/2001 4:04:47 PM
From: AK2004Respond to of 275872
 
Andreas
common analysts assumptions:
too many p4 is bad for amd and good for intel
too few p4 is bad for amd and good for intel
high demand for amd chips is bad for amd and good for intel
low demand for amd chips is bad for amd and good for intel
when it's raining it is raining in favor of intel :-))
Regards
-Albert
ps <insert the news here> is bad for amd and good for intel