SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152409)12/13/2001 12:36:52 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
WBMW, I'm sure if I sell lemonade for 10c a cup, and someone else starts selling lemonade up the street for 5c a cup, I could always conclude that the other guy is trying to "terminate" me.

Prove me wrong. ;-)

Tenchusatsu



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152409)12/13/2001 1:43:33 PM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
OK, like what?

C



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152409)12/13/2001 3:25:22 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Wanda, "They aren't disagreeing that Intel launched a Celeron at a lower price to compete in the sub-$1000 space; rather, they are arguing against your attempt to prove that it was a competitive tactic to force AMD out of the market."

So, in your opinion, "competition" means a friendly
butt-slapping, nothing more, right?

com·pe·ti·tion (kmp-tshn)
n.
Rivalry between two or more businesses striving for the same customer or market.

FYI: strive
To exert much effort or energy; endeavor.
To struggle or fight forcefully; contend: strive against injustice.
------------------

At the time, the only segment where AMD had a competitive
product was the sub-$1000 segment. Intel was not
a player at all in this segment, AMD and Cyrix created it
because they were forced out of main PC segment by Intel.
(BTW, I do not recall Intel "striving" in any segment.)
Aggressively entering a sub-$1000 segment
with subsided product means one thing - to capture the
segment. Which means to drive other players out of
the segment. If a competing company has no other
significant products, this automatically implies the
intent to drive it out of CPU market, and possibly out
of business. Can you spell "Cyrix"?

This is simply pathetic how you guys cannot link more
than one thought together.

- Ali



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152409)12/14/2001 1:46:14 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
>I think it's quite reasonable to recognize that there are other factors in Intel's decision making besides AMD.

And I'm arguing the middle ground, that there a number of factors but that AMD is one of them, and perhaps in a big way. Why shouldn't it be?