SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4618)12/15/2001 12:43:16 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
It will be matter of cost efficiency: The cheapest medium is tape in $per MB basis. But CD's may be the lighter and may be preferable since the most important is to keep the payload light.

The company has to built two satellites since one may go astray in a useless orbit. Then we have to have a satellite ready to shoot up in case the one up there fails.

Or we can keep both up there hot standby and we would be backing up both of them, and switching from one and another to see that both are performing according to the standards of quality we set.

The mechanics can easily sort the details.



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4618)12/16/2001 10:37:07 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Respond to of 46821
 
Hi All,

This optical satellite data link [like a Brush drum recorder] was postulated in the mid-'70s, with three synchronous satellites and a central US uplink/downlink station.

With today's WDM, the capacity would be about 175,000 miles/186,000 miles per second times the number of colors, times the bits per second/color [22,500 miles sync orbit + 4000 miles earth radius => 43,300 miles sat to sat, and 45,000 miles sat/earth/sat totals 175k miles]

~~ .94 * 1024 * 10,000,000,000 = 9.63 trillon bits with 1024 colors of 10Gbps per color

Maybe not worth building. [How much disk storage does WalMart have? I misremember many petabytes]

petere