SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TGPTNDR who wrote (152937)12/20/2001 8:49:14 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
TGPTNDR, Re: "Itanium launched after 7 years!"

Yeah, but it's not like we have anything to compare that to. How many companies have come up with totally new and different architectures, and aim to use them to build a high volume software and platform infrastructure from the ground up, all in the face of an already crowded market. I mean, x86 came about naturally because it was one of the first instruction sets to get a broad software support. It was also very lucky. MIPS has been around for ages, and its "open source" licensing made it very popular academically. Alpha and others RISC architectures capitalized on the shortcomings of a primitive CISC x86 architecture, and would have succeeded, too, if CISC hadn't improved in later years. So, really, how many companies have done what Intel has done? It took them 7 years, but there isn't really anything comparable, IMO.

wbmw



To: TGPTNDR who wrote (152937)12/20/2001 9:05:47 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Pwetender - AMD's SHAMSTER still is not launched - after FIVE YEARS of development.

FIVE YEARS and the AMD SHAMSTER is still not even taped out !!!

Pathetic AMD.



To: TGPTNDR who wrote (152937)12/20/2001 10:33:03 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 

.Itanium was officially launched in late May after more than seven years of development and numerous delays. Intel,

Yes, but Dan3 says this was intentional, he says Intel did not wish to eat into Celeron sales, since they are basically the same processor.